Skip to main content
IronKernel
Products Solutions For Customers About FAQ Contact
IronKernel Platform

Operational ownership boundaries

Product ownership boundaries are explicit so dispatch, maintenance, yard, and personnel decisions stay consistent.

Operating problem

Execution consistency erodes when ownership of readiness and operational state is ambiguous across teams.

Pillar commitments

  • Crew owns personnel readiness and credential posture.
  • CMMS owns asset lifecycle and maintenance readiness context.
  • TMS and YMS consume shared state for execution decisions.

How this pillar operates

These steps describe how the platform principle is applied through implementation and route-level verification.

  1. Step 1

    Assign domain ownership

    Each product module owns a clear operational decision boundary.

  2. Step 2

    Consume shared state across boundaries

    Dispatch, yard, and maintenance flows read authoritative readiness context.

  3. Step 3

    Audit cross-product handoffs

    Solution and feature pages reveal ownership transitions in operational workflows.

Validation checklist

  • Readiness decisions map to explicit owning products.
  • Consumer workflows avoid shadow ownership of shared state.
  • Cross-product handoffs are documented and testable per route.

Proof model

Platform-level proof

  • Crew ownership and decision boundaries are defined as normative behavior.

    verified

    docs/products/crew/product.md · Canonical Ownership & Decision Boundaries (Normative)

  • CMMS integration contracts define cross-product operational boundaries.

    verified

    docs/products/cmms/product.md · Cross-Product Integration Contracts