Skip to main content
IronKernel Platform

Maintenance and dispatchability

Maintenance posture remains actionable when dispatchability and work execution share the same readiness context.

Problem statement

Maintenance and dispatch decisions are often disconnected from each other in day-to-day execution.

Target outcome

Asset maintenance posture and dispatchability context remain visible through execution windows.

Persona focus

  • Operations and Dispatch Manager
  • Safety and Compliance Director

Workflow map

Follow these steps to validate how this solution moves across product and feature boundaries.

  1. Step 1

    Track maintenance posture continuously

    Maintenance operations maintain PM and work-order status as active readiness signals.

    Open related route
  2. Step 2

    Expose dispatchability state to operations

    Asset dispatchability surfaces whether equipment is eligible for operational assignment.

    Open related route
  3. Step 3

    Close loop into active load planning

    Load lifecycle planning uses maintenance-informed readiness for execution decisions.

    Open related route

Validation checklist

  • PM and work-order completion affects dispatchability status.
  • Dispatch-facing readiness excludes non-ready assets.
  • Maintenance and load timelines reconcile without manual overlays.

Proof model

Solution-level proof

  • CMMS asset dispatchability state is maintained in fleet modules and shared to downstream execution planners.

    verified

    docs/products/cmms/product.md · Module Catalog > Asset Registry and Dispatchability

    Code: backend/services/cmms/internal/modules/assets

    Contract: proto/cmms/fleet/v1

  • CMMS dispatchability workflows are implemented in asset and fleet modules.

    verified

    docs/products/cmms/product.md · Module Catalog > Asset Registry and Dispatchability

    Code: backend/services/cmms/internal/modules/assets

    Contract: proto/cmms/fleet/v1